- Conservatives are not promoting, or passing, laws to force women into sex slavery for the purpose of procreation.
- The draft GOP healthcare bill does not shut down or ban Planned Parenthood (PP)--it simply removes tax payer funding for it. It would seem to me that an organization the left feels is so essential, should be able to survive with their generous charitable contributions? The myth that PP offers women's health services besides abortion, like mammograms, has been overwhelmingly debunked by their own CE0 under oath in open testimony. All they do is abortion, harvest, and sell dead baby parts. Period. The so-called "pre-natal ultrasounds" they perform are not to determine the development of the fetus for a healthy birth. They are done to determine the growth of the fetus to see if it matches a customer's purchase order for those baby parts at that stage of development. This is all about supply and demand--PP is a for-profit organization. They don't need tax payer money, and I certainly don't approve of any of MY tax dollars going to it.
- No one is challenging the law legalizing abortion. It is the law--any women in this country is able to get one. How are today's liberal "Handmaidens" trying to liken themselves to fictional characters forced to have babies? To the best of my knowledge, no one is forcing liberal snowflakes to have sex or have babies.
- There are several contraceptives available to to prevent unwanted pregnancy: abstinence, condoms, birth control pills, diaphragm, implants, Intrauterine devices, and the morning after pill to name a few. All available to women today.
Wednesday, June 28, 2017
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Let's not forget the now known testimony of Mr. Comey--under oath--saying Attorney General Loretta Lynch told him to refer in public to the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation as a "matter." To LIE to the public.
Let's not forget the now infamous tarmac incident--when Lynch met with Bill RIGHT before Comey came out and listed the plethora of laws Hillary BROKE and numerous times she LIED--but then let her go free.
Clearly Democrats and their "media" don't REALLY care about obstruction of justice...or this concealment of evidence would be a much bigger story.
Obama and his Administration is hiding behind Executive Privilege once again...like with Fast and Furious.
Ya. That's totally on the same par.
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
Since before the 2016 election, Democrats and liberals have been promoting violence against Conservatives.
During Trump rallies--violence. Bought and paid for by the DNC as proved unequivocally by under cover video footage and those precious, leaked DNC e-mails.
At the Inaugural balls--violence. Committed by liberal snowflakes unable to deal with the crushing reality of loss because their Fake News media failed to report the truth about their weak-ass candidate with no agenda or platform other than an extension of the previous eight years of failure.
At the Inauguration--violence. Riots, vandalism, and violence against Conservatives just trying to attend the Inauguration committed by liberal thugs. In some instances, violence bankrolled by the liberal machine--Soros.
After the Inauguration in DC--violence. Liberal riots thinly veiled as "marches" in which participants vandalized and assaulted those with a different opinion, i.e. Conservatives. And as an added bonus--enormous amounts of trash and pollution left behind by the party who supposedly "cares so much" about the environment.
So-called "comedians" posing with the decapitated head of our President.
So called "actors" in a New York park enacting the assassination of our President.
The propaganda media rationalizing every vicious act and murder of a cop committed by a BLM member as justified.
Acts of violence and assault of white people because, you know, so-called "white privilege."
The now OBVIOUS false narrative of Russian collusion leading to HRC's defeat--which was proven to be totally FAKE by sworn testimony and countless elected Democrats and Republican officials admitting there is nothing to the phony accusations--but is continuing to fuel the anger and violence.
This must STOP.
The man who took up arms today to shoot at GOP members practicing for a softball game was a Bernie Sanders supporter with a Facebook page full of vicious political rhetoric directed against Conservatives and President Trump.
This man was driven to this event by the DNC promoting violence during the election. Driven by eight years of the Obama Administration encouraging violence against White people and Conservatives by saying, "Argue and get in their face", "We need to punish our enemies", " Republicans need to stop talking and get out of the way", and "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun."
The GOP today brought their gloves and a softball to play a game.
The liberal who tried to murder Conservatives brought his guns...just like Obama told him to.
Make no mistake.
This was an act of terrorism.
The legal definition of terrorism is "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
This man posted on Facebook, "It's time to destroy Trump and Co." And so he tried.
This man was also a volunteer on Bernie Sanders campaign. Good ol' Bernie was quick to post that he never met this man, and wasn't associated with him, and not accountable for his action.
Weird. The entire fake narrative of the Trump campaign "collusion" with Russia rests on some dude President Trump has never met, who volunteered on the campaign, and had some Russian business connection ten years ago.
Huh? Odd how there is now an all out Special Prosecutor to investigate possible Trump ties to Russia.
When will we see the FBI or a Special Prosecutor investigation into Bernie Sanders or the DNC's ties to a left-wing nut job's attempt to assassinate Conservatives?
The Capitol Police deserve recognition for their heroics today.
Democrats should be hanging their heads in shame and disgrace for the senseless violence they have instigated.
Sunday, May 14, 2017
Has another sitting United States President committed acts so egregious as to prompt a comparison to the 1970's Nixon Watergate scandal?
But it was not President Trump.
For you young people, who have either never heard of Watergate or only heard the Hollywood version, here is a very truncated version of events: five burglars broke into a Watergate hotel room that was the DNC Headquarters. The investigation found a cash connection between the burglars--one of which was a former CIA and FBI agent, and two others had CIA connections--and the Committee for the Re-Election of the President [Nixon]. Nixon also allegedly used the IRS to spy on his political enemies and activist groups.
Sound familiar? It should, it is the same thing Obama did--only Obama went much further. He didn't just use the IRS as a weapon against his political opponents--he used it against everyday Americans like you and I.
Though originally written off as a right-wing conspiracy theory, as early as 2009 stories began to mount suggesting the Obama Administration was targeting car dealerships for closure that had donated to Republicans and were competitors to a dealership chain partly owned by former Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty as part of Obama's so-called auto bailout plan. Of course, when Lois Lerner admitted during a conference call with reporters that the IRS WAS targeting groups with "Tea Party" or "patriot" in their title, it became a whole lot harder for the liberal propaganda media to cry conspiracy.
The Administration also used the NSA to spy on political opponents. We learned last month that Obama's National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was unmasking Trump campaign officials collaterally collected on during the course of their official duties--including the very normal act of reaching out to foreign dignitaries to begin foreign policy discussions and relationships. Susan Rice was in a political policy position--not an investigative position. She had zero reason to request unmasking of anyone. Since she was not involved in any investigations, what possible reason did she have for unmasking names other than political reasons?
Now about those accusations about collusion with the Russians to influence an election. This is 100% absolutely true...it just does not apply to the 2016 election. The Democrats did it in the 1984 election.
According to Soviet documents revealed in the early 1990's, Ted Kennedy in 1984 literally asked the Soviets--the enemy of the United States--to intervene on behalf of the Democratic Party in the 1984 election. Kennedy even offered to help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up on their propaganda.
But back to those Nixon comparisons.
How is firing a FBI Director that both parties and the American people believe was no longer fulfilling his duties like Nixon? Right up until President Trump fired Comey, Democrats were demanding Comey be fired.
30 October 2016: Former Senate Majority Leader D-Harry Reid accused Comey of breaking the Hatch Act by disclosing details about the Clinton investigation 11 days before the Presidential election.
31 October 2016: D-Steve Cohen called for Comey's resignation and reiterated that call in a 3 November opinion column published in The Hill.
2 November 2016: D-Chuck Schumer told Bloomberg Newd that he had lost confidence in Comey for his handling of Clinton's e-mail investigation.
13 January 2017: Democrats blasted Comey after a briefing on the agency's investigation on Russian election interference. D-Hank Johnson said, "My confidence in the FBI director's ability to lead this agency has been shaken." D-Maxine Waters made her view on it perfectly clear when she said, "The FBI director has no credibility."
24 January 2017: D-G.K. Butterfield said, "I think James Comey needs to fade away into oblivion. He embarrassed this nation...he should not hold any position of trust, whatsoever, in our government.
If firing Comey is akin to Nixon's use of the Federal Government to target political opponents, then aren't the Democrats who called for his firing complicit in that as well?
As if we needed any more proof that liberals and Democrats have no actual position on anything--other than to obstruct progress and be against everything Conservatives and Republicans stand for--their hypocrisy on the Comey firing and ridiculous Nixon comparisons, reveals their true selves.
Hollow, shallow, and baseless.