Sunday, May 14, 2017

How Liberals Put Men at the Top of the Victim List

The legacy of the Obama Administration--aside from record numbers of scandals, straight up lying on a regular basis to the American public, using the full force of the Federal Government against political opponents and Conservative Americans--is identity politics.  Liberals need victims, the more they convince people they are being victimized, and the Democrats are the only ones who can help them, the more voters they get.  
Of course the dirty little secret is that it is precisely the liberal policies that hurt the lower class, disenfranchise people, and create victims.  But so long as their complicit propaganda buddies in the media keep lying and covering for them, they keep their voter base ignorant and angry.  This is because if you are a victim, you must have a victimizer--someone to blame, someone to direct your anger at. 

White privilege and men are the go-to scapegoat.  Blame them.

The feminists scream inequality, lower wages due to sexism, cry and scream over imaginary notions of lack of reproductive rights.  Blame men! 

Liberals, even pussified liberal men, claim men are the root of all evil.  Men are responsible for all the grievances for all people who feel they have been disenfranchised in some, usually imaginary, way. 

The weird thing is, since liberals have everyone clambering to be a victim, there have been some unintended consequences.  White men and women pretending to be black, politicians pretending to be Native American, and men pretending to be women.  

You see, the so-called party of science has decided your genetics are not applicable in determining who you are--it only matters how you feel, how you identify.  

Well, that was all fine and dandy until men started identifying as women.  That puts them higher up on the victimhood scale than women.  Men identifying as women now have more rights than women, their feelings are now more important than women.  

Men want to use the ladies room--go right ahead, any woman who objects is a bigot and a victimizer. 

Men want to use the woman's locker room showers--go right ahead, any woman who objects is a bigot and a victimizer. 

Men are now competing and beating women in every sport, including boxing where men are literally beating up women--any woman who objects is a bigot and a victimizer. 

A man who identifies as and dresses like a woman wins Woman of the Year--any woman who objects is a bigot and a victimizer. 

Congratulations helped lower yourself on the victim scale and put men back on top--any woman who objects is a bigot and a victimizer. 

Where's your pussy hat now?  Oh wait, the men are wearing it now. 

Watergate 2.0

Has another sitting United States President committed acts so egregious as to prompt a comparison to the 1970's Nixon Watergate scandal? 

Yes.  Absolutely. 

But it was not President Trump.

For you young people, who have either never heard of Watergate or only heard the Hollywood version, here is a very truncated version of events: five burglars broke into a Watergate hotel room that was the DNC Headquarters.  The investigation found a cash connection between the burglars--one of which was a former CIA and FBI agent, and two others had CIA connections--and the Committee for the Re-Election of the President [Nixon].  Nixon also allegedly used the IRS to spy on his political enemies and activist groups. 

Sound familiar?  It should, it is the same thing Obama did--only Obama went much further.  He didn't just use the IRS as a weapon against his political opponents--he used it against everyday Americans like you and I. 

Though originally written off as a right-wing conspiracy theory, as early as 2009 stories began to mount suggesting the Obama Administration was targeting car dealerships for closure that had donated to Republicans and were competitors to a dealership chain partly owned by former Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty as part of Obama's so-called auto bailout plan.  Of course, when Lois Lerner admitted during a conference call with reporters that the IRS WAS targeting groups with "Tea Party" or "patriot" in their title, it became a whole lot harder for the liberal propaganda media to cry conspiracy.  

The Administration also used the NSA to spy on political opponents.  We learned last month that Obama's National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, was unmasking Trump campaign officials collaterally collected on during the course of their official duties--including the very normal act of reaching out to foreign dignitaries to begin foreign policy discussions and relationships.  Susan Rice was in a political policy position--not an investigative position.  She had zero reason to request unmasking of anyone.  Since she was not involved in any investigations, what possible reason did she have for unmasking names other than political reasons?

Now about those accusations about collusion with the Russians to influence an election.  This is 100% absolutely just does not apply to the 2016 election. The Democrats did it in the 1984 election. 

According to Soviet documents revealed in the early 1990's, Ted Kennedy in 1984 literally asked the Soviets--the enemy of the United States--to intervene on behalf of the Democratic Party in the 1984 election.  Kennedy even offered to help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up on their propaganda. 

But back to those Nixon comparisons. 

How is firing a FBI Director that both parties and the American people believe was no longer fulfilling his duties like Nixon?  Right up until President Trump fired Comey, Democrats were demanding Comey be fired. 

30 October 2016: Former Senate Majority Leader D-Harry Reid accused Comey of breaking the Hatch Act by disclosing details about the Clinton investigation 11 days before the Presidential election.

31 October 2016: D-Steve Cohen called for Comey's resignation and reiterated that call in a 3 November opinion column published in The Hill. 

2 November 2016: D-Chuck Schumer told Bloomberg Newd that he had lost confidence in Comey for his handling of Clinton's e-mail investigation. 

13 January 2017: Democrats blasted Comey after a briefing on the agency's investigation on Russian election interference.  D-Hank Johnson said, "My confidence in the FBI director's ability to lead this agency has been shaken." D-Maxine Waters made her view on it perfectly clear when she said, "The FBI director has no credibility."

24 January 2017: D-G.K. Butterfield said, "I think James Comey needs to fade away into oblivion.  He embarrassed this nation...he should not hold any position of trust, whatsoever, in our government. 

If firing Comey is akin to Nixon's use of the Federal Government to target political opponents, then aren't the Democrats who called for his firing complicit in that as well?  

As if we needed any more proof that liberals and Democrats have no actual position on anything--other than to obstruct progress and be against everything Conservatives and Republicans stand for--their hypocrisy on the Comey firing and ridiculous Nixon comparisons, reveals their true selves.  

Hollow, shallow, and baseless.  

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Literally or Seriously?

Since before the election, through the inauguration, and into the Trump Presidency, the left-wing media has been beating the drum of Russian election tampering conspiracy. 

So deluded by their own fantasy world and lies, they constructed an elaborate fabrication to attempt to explain how their flawed, cheating, lying candidate lost the election. It couldn't be that their policies sucked?

The narrative became: The Russians hacked the election!

The FBI has confirmed that no votes were changed by Russians. 

New narrative: The Russians hacked the DNC to expose and humiliate Hillary Clinton and portray her and the Democratic party in a negative way!

Ah yes, because she didn't do that herself with the Whitewater scandal, when she covered up Bill's sexual assaults and personally attacked his victims, when she and Bill stole $190,000 worth of White House property after his Presidency, when she lied to America about the terrorist attack in Benghazi, when she took foreign money to enrich herself by selling out America, when she illegally set up a private server to conduct private "Clinton Foundation business" and official State Department business off record and free of FOIA requests, or when she illegally passed and shared classified information with people who had no security clearances or valid need to know. 

No, the Russians did not expose her for the wretch she is, she did that herself.  

So, did the Russians influence America in the campaign by exposing how she and the DNC cheated and schemed to ensure she would be the nominee by disenfranchising millions of voters who didn't want her, revealing how her minions secretly passed her questions ahead of debates, and by showing her campaign colluding with the media? 

No. Most of us knew that was happening, the leaks just confirmed our suspicions. 

Then Trump tweets about Obama wiretapping Trump Tower...and the left-wing media explodes. 

Countless articles are written to condescend and define what the legal term wiretap really means.  You see, Washington is full of useless lawyers who parse and choose their words with the upmost care, knowing exactly how to speak without saying anything at all.  

Of course it was ol' Slick Willy himself who cemented his place in Presidential failure history when he rationalized to the grand jury about why he wasn't lying when he said to his top aides that with respect to Monica Lewinsky, "there's nothing going on between us," because he said, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is . . . if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."

Um...what?  Spoken like a true liar, er, I mean lawyer.  Albeit, a disbarred lawyer, but still.

What the left-wing media will never understand about Trump's appeal, is that he speaks in layman's terms.  He speaks like us...not in legalese or DC insider language.  He speaks like an average American.  

Thus, the White House spokesman comes out to do his do diligence to explain Trump used the term "wiretap" in colloquial terms, as a general term to refer to surveillance.  

Fair enough, right?  No...the left-wing media and liberal crazies were having none of it.  And when the FBI  seemed to confirm there was no "wiretap," the left demanded apologies and investigations.

But let's not talk about how the Russians didn't really hack the election. 

John Podesta compromised himself and DNC campaign-related e-mails with poor computer security practices when he succumbed to spear phishing. 

1. The DNC is not a government organization, DNC e-mails being leaked is not equivalent to the National election being "hacked."

2. If the media is going to make a big stink that Trump use proper terminology to refer to the various intelligence collection methods, then by God that same media better use the right terminology to refer to how the DNC's e-mails really got leaked. 

My point?  The absence of "wiretapping" is not proof the Obama Administration did not spy or conduct surveillance against Trump and his team. 

What is the bigger story here?  Trump not using the right word, or the possibility/fact that Obama and/or his Administration did actually spy on an incoming President and political rival?

Journalism is dead and this is the problem with taking Trump literally and not taking him seriously.

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

A Day Without A Clue

Wow, what can I say about the liberal hijacking of International Woman's Day to stage "A Day without Women", how embarrassing...for America and all women, everywhere.

Not showing up to work to prove how "valuable" you are to the workforce is pretty much the most backwards thing I ever heard.  It's just so idiotic, it could only make sense in the mind of a liberal.  

By not showing up to work, you proved how you can't be counted on by your team, how selfish you are, and what a detriment you are to your colleagues.

By not showing up to work, you burdened families, single parents, and your co-workers who had to either to PAY for child care or miss work--costing them a day of leave or their pay--or do your work. 

Do not mistake this for proof of how valuable you are--you CAN be replaced, there just wasn't time to replace you for TODAY.  

As you enjoyed your day off, no doubt posting Tweets and Facebook messages about how great you think you are and basking in your delusional self worth, I'm sure the women in OTHER countries stood in solidarity with you as you clearly face the same plight as them.  You are so oppressed and disadvantaged in the United States.

I'm sure the eight year old girl being forcefully married off after having her genitals mutilated is so glad you stayed home from work to show how valuable you are. 

I'm sure the woman being forced to abort her daughter because only sons are allowed is so glad you stayed home from work to show how awesome you are for supporting abortions.

I'm sure the women who are banned from education and ever having a job outside the home are so glad you stayed home from work to show how oppressed you are. 

When I got to work this morning, my male colleagues at the front desk cheered and clapped and thanked me, and all the other women entering, for coming in to do my job.  

I know that as a female worker I am valued, I am appreciated, and I make a difference.  

I don't need to stage a publicity stunt to understand that...

...but then again, I'm not a whiny, vagina-hat wearing, liberal bitch either.


Wednesday, March 1, 2017

The Groan that Revealed Everything

President Trump's speech last night was nothing short of phenomenal; even hard-core leftists had to admit it. 

The decorum of the Democrats in the audience was appalling, disgraceful, and I'd say shocking--if it wasn't so expected at this point. 

However, we did learn one surprising thing last night about the Democrats.

When President Trump announced his order to DHS to create the Victims Of Immigration Crime Engagement Office (VOICE), to provide a voice to "those who have been ignored by our media, and silenced by special interests," there was an audible groan from the Democrats in the seats.

The party of identity politics and victim worshippers finally found a victim they won't support: victims of violence, assault, and murder committed by illegal immigrants. 

Let that sink in a minute.  

Yeah, now you understand why Trump won and the Democrats lost so badly--they just don't get it.  
They would actually rather support the foreign criminal rather than an American victim.  I can't think of anything more unAmerican.  

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Do as I Say, Not as I Do

Liberals and Democrats are still calling for a special prosecutor to investigate Russian ties to Trump.

Let's not forget, at this point all intelligence agencies that would be in the know, and even major news outlets, have acknowledged there are no indicators of any illicit "ties."  But then again, no one has ever accused liberals of rational thinking.  This is just another play in their game to continue to try to discredit Trump's win and explain how Hillary lost so badly.

I mean, they are only demanding Republicans do what they did during the Obama Administration, right? 

Like when they appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the botched DOJ and ATF gun running scheme, Operation Fast and Furious, which put guns into the hands of murderous cartel members on both sides of the border who used them to kill a DHS border patrol officer.  Fast and Furious guns were also traced to the Paris nightclub attack.

Oh wait.  No, they didn't do that; Obama claimed "Executive Privilege" and swept it under the rug.

Like when they appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS for targeting conservatives for audits and harassment, and denying conservative groups charity status thereby denying their 1st Amendment right.

Oh wait.  No, they didn't do that.  Even after ADMITTING it during a live conference call, IRS's Lois Lerner pled the 5th and was never held accountable.

Like when they appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the completely fake Benghazi talking points and who instrumented the coordinated lies fed to the American people about a fake protest getting out of control rather than telling the truth about a terrorist attack leading to  our Libyan Ambassador's death and a three other great Americans.

Oh wait.  No, they didn't do that.  

Like when they appointed a special prosecutor to investigate Hilary's illegal private e-mail server that she used to circumvent the FOIA law and used it to illegally pass classified information to her inner circle, some of which didn't even have security clearances....all the while conducting Clinton Foundation business on the taxpayer time for personal enrichment on that system.

Oh wait.  No, they didn't do that.  They had a shady meeting on the tarmac at an airport between a has-been, shamed and impeached Democrat President and democrat-appointed Attorney General, to ensure their buddies in the DOJ would influence the FBI into not recommending prosecution.

Um ya...typical hypocrisy from the liberals who demand Conservatives be held to the highest standard while they are held to no standards at all.  More of the "do as I say, not as I do" mentality.  

To my readers, be strong! 

The left and the media are in full freak out mode and trying to do everything they can to make you think Trump is corrupt, failing, and that the world is against him.  The news is Fake.

The irony is that it was Obama who was (still is) corrupt, who failed, and who lacked true global support.  It was just never portrayed that way in the media because we no longer have journalism; we have the Democrat party's propaganda arm--also known as main stream media, the unmasking of the alt left.

Do you think all these "organic and spontaneous" protests at the Town Halls are legit?  Then explain why in every picture I see the opposition "constituents" have identical signs the are holding up?  Nothing says organic and spontaneous like the mass production of carefully printed out signs and rehearsed talking points.  Opposite of organic and spontaneous, this is very much orchestrated and coordinated. 

Friday, February 17, 2017

Not The Droids You Are Looking For...

Since the Fake News of Russia hacking the election has been solidly debunked, liberals have invented a new fib to peddle in their seemingly never ending effort to comfort themselves with lies.  Now they are saying, "Fine...Russia may not have hacked the election, but they influenced Trump voters."

This is such a typical liberal play for two big reasons.

One. It's completely unprovable.

All the liberals have to do is throw this accusation out there and keep repeating it.  Their cohorts in the media are never going to ask, let alone demand, they produce one shred of evidence to support this. They put to burden of proof on Conservatives and Trump voters to prove we weren't influenced.  

How do you prove that you weren't influenced by a messaging and propaganda campaign that either never existed or you never tuned into? You can't.  

So their accusation is allowed to linger in the shadows and gets dredged up whenever some lib wants to attempt to delegitimization Trumps Presidential victory.

Two. Democrats floated this lie out there because it is the very tactic they use against their own voters. They think that because it works on their voters, it worked on us.

If there is one thing the Dems do well--it is influencing and convincing their voters to act against their own best interests.  

How else can you explain why people in places like Detroit, a once prosperous and gleaming city that was full of potential until ravaged by Democrat policies, continues to vote for Democrats?

How else can you explain why black voters would register and vote for the same Democrat Party that spawned the KKK, and kept electing former klansman Senator Byrd to public office from 1947 until he died in office in 2010 at the ripe old age of 92?  Byrd by the way was no run-of-the-mill klan member, he was a recruiter who rose to the position of Kleagle and Exalted Cyclops--he was a true believer, i.e. racist.

How else to you convince people that Margaret Sanger's organization, Planned Parenthood, which was designed to commit genocide and obliterate the entire black race, is not only a "women's right" but a taxpayer obligation?

How else do convince millions of your voters who are hindered by nothing more than their own incompetence laziness that they are "victims" who need to be compensated by everyone else? 

You influence them until they believe it.  You repeat it, you print it, you teach it, you indoctrinate it, and you broadcast it until the deception becomes the truth.

Mirror imaging is when you project your values and culture on a person or group and believe they are, or will respond, like you.  This is what the liberals are doing when they accuse Trump voters of being influenced by the Russians.

Because liberals are so completely susceptible to influence, they think the rest of us Americans are too.

Sorry to disappoint, but we aren't as 
weak-minded as the simple libs who see their precious Hollywood icons making their ridiculous PSAs to vote a certain way and buy into the propaganda.

We aren't influenced by the not-so-subtle jabs and insults against Trump and Republicans weaved into sitcoms and TV dramas.  In fact, after watching those, the only thing I was influenced to do was turn it off and cancel my cable subscription and cancel Netflix along with it.

And here is a big one, so listen up media, we aren't influenced by your Fake News, or Very Fake News.

Calling out the so-called "press" for bias and outright fake stories is not an attack on the 1st Amendment.

The 1st Amendment mandates that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The Democrats and liberals attacked the 1st Amendment when they used the IRS to silence Conservative charities by denying them 501/503 status.  

The Democrats and liberals attacked the 1st Amendment when they paid thugs to commit acts of violence at Trump campaign rallies and prevented citizens from attending the Inauguration. 

Neither Congress nor Trump has passed any law abridging freedom of speech or press.

Trump just called them out for their bullshit.

No, the leftist mind tricks don't work on us.     But then again, Democrats aren't Jedi Masters either.  They just have a constituency of droids.